Sergio Perez and Oscar Piastri said their qualifying performances were compromised by the stewards deleting their lap times, then reinstating them.
Both drivers were told one of their lap times had been deleted during the session because they had run wide at turn one. However in both cases the stewards then changed their minds and allowed the laps to stand.Perez’s incident occured after his first flying lap in Q1. The stewards took seven minutes to reverse their decision to delete his lap time, by which point Perez had returned to the track on a fresh set of tyres in a bid to ensure he reached Q2.
He said afterwards that compromised his performance in the rest of the session as it meant he used a set of fresh tyres earlier than he needed to.
“Going into Q3 with a single new set of tyres cost us,” said the Red Bull driver. “We lost a set in Q1 when they took my first lap away and then told us too late it was reinstated, when I was already out on a new tyre. It was unfortunate and compromised that session.”
Piastri’s first flying lap was deleted in Q3, but three minutes later the stewards changed their minds again. He said that “didn’t help” his preparation for his final run.
“I knew starting the lap, or even leaving the pits, that lap was at least on the board again. But I knew that I would need more to keep at least that position, or obviously I want to go for pole. So I knew I needed more anyway.
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
“I found a bit more, just not quite enough. So it was a slightly stressful few minutes. I didn’t really dwell on it too much but I did think I was in. Clearly it was so close that they’ve probably given me the benefit of the doubt, but it wasn’t exactly ideal.”
The McLaren driver said he backed off too much for the first corner on his final attempt.
“I didn’t have to take more margin, but I did by accident. I lost a decent amount of time through turn one, which was a shame.
“I obviously had in mind that even though the lap got given back, I knew it was incredibly close. But I probably gave a little bit more margin than I wanted to. So that was a bit of a shame.
“I think if it hadn’t have been taken away, then given back, maybe I would have been a little bit more aggressive through there. But that’s how it is, it’s the same rules for everybody. So I’ll just take P2.”
Miss nothing from RaceFans
Get a daily email with all our latest stories - and nothing else. No marketing, no ads. Sign up here:
Go ad-free for just £1 per month
>> Find out more and sign up
2024 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix
- Did Tsunoda ‘destroy’ his team mates – and are Red Bull wrong to pick Lawson over him?
- McLaren were ‘0.7 seconds away from losing the title’ in Abu Dhabi – Brown
- Another name change for RB and new driver numbers revealed in 2025 F1 entry list
- Ranked: The Formula 1 cars of 2024, from slowest to fastest
- McLaren are world champions with fewest grand prix wins in 25 years
Imre (@f1mre)
7th December 2024, 19:54
It was ridiculous. And where are the gravel strips that work well at other tracks?
Jere (@jerejj)
8th December 2024, 4:40
Ikr. The small gravel piece solution that proved to work well should be used on more circuits.
pcxmac (@pcxmac)
7th December 2024, 20:21
you think they would position the cameras to actually be able to see the line properly. Too many camera guys, not enough guys who think the problem all the way through and want to get a car on to the track to train the camera properly.
pcxmac (@pcxmac)
7th December 2024, 20:22
oh wait, nvm, I forgot they got the tennis guy to setup the cameras, that explains everything I guess.
Jon
8th December 2024, 7:56
In 1990s F1 if you went over curb the punishment would have been instant.
Curbs where higher and put people of for using them , they also was not wide and grass or gravel would have been waiting..
Osnola
8th December 2024, 11:04
Using those curbes now would mean instant death in current cars.
You have seem to missed the flying formula car several years ago.