The Australian Grand Prix served up surprises after back-to-back Red Bull one-twos in the opening races of 2024. An early retirement for Max Verstappen opened the door for the team’s rivals to take a rare victory.
Ferrari took full advantage, beating McLaren to secure their first win since Singapore last year as well as the team’s first one-two in two seasons.They did this by outmanoeuvring McLaren to get Charles Leclerc ahead of Lando Norris. But when he began to close on his race leading team mate Carlos Sainz Jnr, Ferrari were quick to tell their drivers to hold position.
Further back, the disruption to the race caused by Lewis Hamilton’s retirement presented an opportunity to other teams. Among them were Haas, who for the second race in a row used Kevin Magnussen to help his team mate score points.
Early trouble
Verstappen secured his third consecutive pole of the season in Saturday’s qualifying session, which put him in with a strong chance of a hat trick of victories from the start of the season. However, from the moment the lights went out, he struggled with an stuck right-rear brake that slowly overheated to a critical point, which put him out of his first grand prix for exactly two years.
Lap: 1/58 VER: 1’27.458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lap: 2/58 VER: 1’24.099 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lap: 3/58 VER: 1’23.115 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lap: 4/58 |
With Verstappen out of the race, Sainz led from Lando Norris, Leclerc and Oscar Piastri. Leclerc struggled to get by the McLaren and join his team mate up front, so Ferrari tried to leap him ahead of the McLaren by pitting him earlier.
Lap: 5/58 LEC: 1’22.632 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lap: 6/58 LEC: 1’22.673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lap: 8/58 LEC: 1’22.983 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lap: 9/58 LEC: 1’36.036 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lap: 10/58 LEC: 1’27.861 |
Sauber had struggled with malfunctioning pit equipment through the first two rounds, leading to pit problems for Valtteri Bottas in Bahrain and his team mate Zhou Guanyu in Jeddah. In Melbourne, both drivers suffered more problems in the pits.
Lap: 14/58 BOT: 1’23.395 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lap: 15/58 BOT: 1’23.329 |
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
Alonso’s good timing
After Verstappen’s retirement, Piastri followed Leclerc into the pits. McLaren brought in team mate Norris, the team warned Piastri that he might meet Norris coming out of the pit lane, but Piastri was clear.
Lap: 14/58 PIA: 1’21.968 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lap: 28/58 PIA: 1’22.204 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lap: 29/58 PIA: 1’23.479 |
Sainz led up the end of lap 16, where he came in for his first stop. Fernando Alonso was the only driver in the top five not to have pitted as Sainz emerged right in front of him. But then as he overtook the Ferrari on cold tyres, the field were forced to slow due to Lewis Hamilton’s sudden problem with his Mercedes.
Lap: 16/58 HAM: |
Lap: 14/58 ALO: 1’23.455 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lap: 16/58 ALO: 1’23.239 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lap: 17/58 ALO: 1’48.609 |
McLaren were afraid the VSC would allow Alonso to keep ahead of Norris when he pitted. However, the Aston Martin emerged just behind the two McLarens in fifth, ahead of George Russell.
Lap: 17/58 NOR: 1’38.388 |
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
Team orders
Piastri was ahead of his team mate in third, on course for a podium in his home grand prix. However, Norris behind had fresher tyres and pace that was quicker than the Ferraris ahead. So there was little argument when McLaren asked Piastri to step aside for his team mate.
Lap: 28/58 PIA: 1’22.204 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lap: 29/58 PIA: 1’23.479 |
Ferrari were looking comfortable out front. Leclerc was just outside of DRS range of his leading team mate, but he got the call not to push to challenge Sainz ahead.
Lap: 19/58 LEC: 1’21.881, SAI: 1’21.811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lap: 20/58 LEC: 1’21.885, SAI: 1’21.602 |
Down in 11th, Haas driver Kevin Magnussen was just ahead of team mate Nico Hulkenberg. The earlier VSC allowed Hulkenberg to pit for mediums, which meant he was on newer, faster tyres than his team mate. For the second race in a row, Magnussen played the team game and would ultimately be rewarded by a double points finish by the end of the grand prix.
Lap: 21/58 HUL: 1’22.479, MAG: 1’22.860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lap: 22/58 HUL: 1’22.439, MAG: 1’23.315 | Magnussen | Slade |
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
Ferrari plays it safe
Leclerc pitted first out of the two Ferraris again the second time around. Sainz had a moment of concern that his team mate could manage to jump ahead of him, but he was reassured by the team that he had nothing to worry about.
Lap: 38/58 LEC: 1’20.949, SAI: 1’21.412 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lap: 39/58 LEC: 1’20.909, SAI: 1’21.554 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lap: 40/58 LEC: 1’20.953, SAI: 1’21.443 |
Norris was around three seconds behind Leclerc and trying whatever he could to catch up to the two scarlet cars. But he had to admit that at this race, he just did not have the same performance as the Scuderia.
Lap: 48/58 NOR: 1’20.260 |
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
Celebrations and commiserations
The end of the grand prix was marred by the penultimate-lap crash of George Russell who lost control of his car at turn six in contentious circumstances chasing Alonso. The accident required all race engineers to respond quickly to the danger and a full breakdown of the reactions to the accident can be found here and Alonso’s messages prior to and after Russell’s shunt are here.
But as it was clear that Russell was safe and well, Ferrari, and Sainz, celebrated a rare and memorable grand prix victory – just two weeks after the driver had undergone emergency surgery during the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix weekend for appendicitis.
Chequered flag |
Ferrari’s win ended a nine-race winning streak for Red Bull and Verstappen – one of the longest in Formula 1 history immediately following their last record-breaking winning streak. But while Sergio Perez came home in fifth place, it would later turn out that a discarded tear-off had caught underneath his car, affecting the efficiency of his floor.
Team principal Christian Horner offered condolences to his sole remaining driver, suggesting Red Bull’s result had reflected Perez’s car more than his own performance.
Chequered flag |
Become a RaceFans Supporter
RaceFans is run thanks in part to the generous support of its readers. By contributing £1 per month or £12 per year (or the same in whichever currency you use) you can help cover the costs of creating, hosting and developing RaceFans today and in the future.
Become a RaceFans Supporter today and browse the site ad-free. Sign up or find out more via the links below:
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
2024 Australian Grand Prix
- Alonso calls Australian GP penalty a ‘one-off I’ve had too many of’
- Red Bull saw warning sign of Australian GP brake problem on Saturday – Verstappen
- Failing to punish Alonso would have “opened a can of worms” – Russell
- Leclerc sure “many team principals” are pursuing Sainz for 2025 seat
- “Don’t put me under pressure” – The best unheard team radio from Melbourne
MichaelN
29th March 2024, 13:07
I know the ‘no driver coaching’ wasn’t that popular when it was briefly enforced, but these things do kind of detract from the myth of F1. I get why teams do this, but it does make it feel a bit like the drivers are puppets on the strings of a guy sat behind a laptop looking at tables of numbers. Not exactly heroic.
On a different note, props to Haas for apparently having a solid working relation between their two drivers. That reads like a very smooth swap with a good eye for the team’s interest.
TylerS
29th March 2024, 13:24
I feel like the rule that drivers must ‘drive the car alone and unaided’ needs to be re-written to reflect the modern era of radio instructions coming from the team. In the past I imagine that was meant to quell any possible use of remote control from the teams making settings changes on the car without the driver having to do it (i.e. the team changing diff and brake balance settings for the driver at each corner), and wasn’t intended to pertain to radio messages telling the driver what settings to change. I personally don’t mind the teams telling the driver what settings to change on the fly. These cars aren’t stick-shifts with three buttons any more, and the drivers can’t reasonably be expected to handle the huge amount of info that’s capable of displaying on their wheel AND still drive the car competitively.
So I’d be fine with the rule being re-written to say something more like ‘the driver must be responsible for making any changes to the car while driving’ as a way to allow the team to tell them what changes to make. To me, that’s still the driver driving the car alone and unaided. I don’t think ‘unaided’ needs to go back to the interpretation of ‘you can’t even tell the driver which switch is in the wrong position’, like with Hamilton at Baku. That will just lead to a dangerous situation with a driver being distracted trying to fix too many settings and being unable to fully focus on racing.
AlanD
29th March 2024, 13:48
Tyler, I take the opposite view, that these coaching messages from the pits are detracting from the racing. I felt it was right that Hamilton lost places in Baku because he had a switch in the wrong position. It was his fault, he was the driver, he lost the race as a result. I don’t buy into the idea that there is so much info and so many buttons to press that the driver cannot be expected to cope. Firstly, that is poor engineering and ergonomic design, and if all drivers were faced with this problem, teams coming up with better designs which didn’t overload the driver with useless info would gain an advantage. Secondly, the drivers who are better at learning how to drive their car, and better at assimilating data, better at working out for themselves where the tyre wear is occuring, where they could easily brake later, etc, would also gain an advantage.
MichaelN
29th March 2024, 14:53
Just to highlight this: one probably also feeds into the other. If it’s possible and allowed to adjust a dozen or more different settings, and to off load the mental side of that to an external engineer, that will quickly become the optimal way to do the race. It’s totally fair that the teams do this, and it’s like Schumacher dialing in brake balance every corner taken a couple steps further. But other things that would improve performance are either not possible to change (like tyre pressure), possible but no longer allowed (like adjustable front wings), while others are possible and regulated (like adjustable rear wings).
In an era where F1 struggles to insert some performance variables into the races, this seems like an easy thing target. The difference won’t be huge, but it’ll make the drivers a bit more important again. For good and bad. Teams would no doubt adjust the cars’ setup to be a bit more middle of the road, and – like AlanD notes – simplify their operation, so the drivers can still make changes to, for example, the deployment of the battery. It wouldn’t be a major change by any means, but there’s just something about an engineer telling an F1 driver to take it slightly easier to one specific corner – and doing so in the middle of the race – that feels a bit off.
Alianora La Canta (@alianora-la-canta)
2nd April 2024, 20:35
The ban was unpopular for several reasons – one of which was that it was obvious that not only did the FIA not know the difference between driver coaching and less controversial uses of the radio, but neither did the teams. It also became obvious that attempting to run without radios would lead to lawsuits – and even a raft of exceptions wasn’t going to help if a problem that the FIA did not anticipate occurred.
The only way to make it work for F1 would be to take out a lot of what enables F1 to happen at all.
pcxmac (@pcxmac)
29th March 2024, 21:00
In Ferrari’s defense its been a long time since they had a 1-2 and it might be a long time hence forth till RBR have another fall from first place. That said, Ferrari if they do show sure genuine pace, where its feasible they will continue to fight for first, there will be less conservative racing between the two drivers.
Getting the 1-2 was a very impressive milestone, but definitely not the last. Charles is gonna have to learn to race with a heavy race car, cause it looks like hes optimized for low fuel running, and if hes still losing out in pole position, then he probably didn’t have the pace.
Bullfrog (@bullfrog)
29th March 2024, 21:44
Intrigued and amused by the Ferrari engineer’s last message (before he bursts into song.)
What’s Carlos allowed and encouraged to drink? A secondary drinks bottle with Ferrari champagne – open in case of victory?
“Pick up” is, I assume, collecting rubber, gravel and stuff on the tyres so the car’s not underweight – but wouldn’t draining the drinks bottle counteract that?
AlanD
30th March 2024, 14:04
Yes, you are right, pick up is about picking up whatever dense debris you can on the tyres to give an extra five kilos or so of weight on the tyres, to ensure they are not underweight. The driver is being told to drink as much as he can at that point becuse he has been in a flat position for best part of two hours, perspiring etc, and if he is dehydrated, when he stands up to get out of the car, there is a chance he will be light headed, so drinking all the remaining drink at that point helps counteract this. It might seem that this will reduce the weight of the car but apart from the fact that we are only talking about half a kilo of liquid, remember that the weight is going into the driver, and the driver plus helmet is also weighed at the end of the race, and that is added to the weight of the car. If I recall correctly, the driver is not allowed anything to drink after getting out of the car until he has been weighed, which is another reason to remind the to drink from the car bottle while he has the opportunity.
Alianora La Canta (@alianora-la-canta)
2nd April 2024, 20:37
@bullfrog Drinking from the bottle would counteract that, but this is more than balanced by the benefit it gives the drivers in staying upright once the adrenaline’s worn off.
AlexS
1st April 2024, 22:41
I think that is correct, the driver weight is part of “car legal weight” so fluid in the bottle or in the driver have the same result.
Alianora La Canta (@alianora-la-canta)
2nd April 2024, 20:38
It does until the driver sweats it out, some of which will happen before the weighing.